GOOD PROGRAM BUT NOT WORTH 24000 EUROS. COULD HAVE BEEN ORGANIZED AND MORE OPPORTUNITIES SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.
Avis de Cuzasoki_25042 - MSc in Wine and Hospitality Management - KEDGE Business School
-
Quel est, selon vous, le principal atout de ce programme ?
The networking events and trips are a very good experience and exposure to the wine world.
-
Quelle est, selon vous, la principale faiblesse de ce programme ?
The program is very badly organised. The students are not treated as masters students but rather like high school, not professional at all. We did not have the timetable of the courses before hand nor did we know the grading for the course before hand. The exams are held three or four months after the course completion. We do not receive grades or feedback for the presentations, projects, exams or anything. Which is the whole point of the learning curve. It is highly dependant on group projects, and sometimes groups are hard to work when there are irresponsible peers. The focus should be on individual assignments or exams rather. One of the biggest remark is that, we were told at the time of admission that the degree would be dual along withe EHL. The partnership ended and the school did not even bother to share this with the students until multiple follow ups from the class end. The course fee of 24000 Euros without the EHL Certification is unacceptable. Overall, i felt like the time and money spent by the student is not valued.
-
Commentaires généraux
When french is such an essential part of living in France, it should be part of the module rather than having it one day a week. The french classes were not at all helpful.
Évaluation générale - MSc in Wine and Hospitality Management à KEDGE Business School
Moyenne générale
Pédagogie du programme
International
Vie étudiante
Réseau et insertion professionnelle
Retour sur investissement
-
410
Contenu académique du programme
The courses during the semester are not divided properly. All the wine subjects are during the 2nd semester along with the WSET Level 3.
-
510
Qualité des professeurs permanents
-
910
Qualité des intervenants professionnels extérieurs
The external lecturers were incredible
-
410
Contrôle des connaissances, volume et répartition des cours, travail personnel
-
510
Reconnaissance internationale du programme
-
510
Accompagnement/aide si départ à l'étranger
-
310
Services aux étudiants (orientation, projet pro., scolarité, etc.)
There could have been more professional guidance from the school, better filtering of students admitted to the program.
-
310
Ambiance, cohésion dans la promo (projets, entraide, loisirs, associations)
The class has very varied backgrounds, which is good until a certain limit. Some of the courses felt redundant and repetitive.
-
310
Ville étudiante, logement (coût, accès, situation)
-
510
Réseau des anciens, contacts professionnels
-
510
Qualité du directeur de programme et notoriété de la formation
The program director definitely has great contacts which we did connect with during the year in the form of visits and study trips.
-
310
Stages et aide à l'insertion professionnelle
There could have been more help from the school to reach out to the networks of the school for internships and jobs.
-
110
Êtes-vous globalement satisfait de votre formation ?
The administration and management is very disorganized
-
110
Referiez-vous le même choix de formation aujourd’hui ?
